On 24.01.25 13:30, Ming Lei wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 06:30:19PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote: >> But as mentioned before, since this is intended to be a test tool for file >> systems, performance is not the primary goal here (though the higher the better >> as that shortens test times). Simplicity is. And as Ted also stated, introducing >> a ublk and rust dependency in xfstests is far from ideal. > > Simplicity need to be observed from multiple dimensions, 300 vs. 1500 LoC has > shown something already, IMO. > To add my $.02 here, if there's another dependency for these tests for xfstests they're just going to be skipped by 99.9% of the people running xfstests. Also 300 LoC Rust code don't translate well to C. All kernel developers know how to debug and write C code, at the moment only a fraction knows Rust.
