Re: Possible locking bug in the block layer [was syzbot: Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in iov_iter_revert (2)]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Possible locking bug in the block layer [was syzbot: Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in iov_iter_revert (2)]
From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 06:55:40 +0000
Cc: dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAFj5m9KusEo=jQbt1AC=EQoOM-0EXmjjc_9WtSBCq+eMOSN8pw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
References: <CAFj5m9KusEo=jQbt1AC=EQoOM-0EXmjjc_9WtSBCq+eMOSN8pw@mail.gmail.com> <1225307.1733323625@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> #syz test: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git
> for-6.14/block

syzbot isn't on the To: or cc: lines.  I can forward the request if you want?

David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Possible locking bug in the block layer [was syzbot: Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in iov_iter_revert (2)]
  - From: David Howells
- Re: Possible locking bug in the block layer [was syzbot: Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in iov_iter_revert (2)]
  - From: David Howells
- Re: Possible locking bug in the block layer [was syzbot: Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in iov_iter_revert (2)]
  - From: Ming Lei

References:
- Re: Possible locking bug in the block layer [was syzbot: Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in iov_iter_revert (2)]
  - From: Ming Lei
- Possible locking bug in the block layer [was syzbot: Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in iov_iter_revert (2)]
  - From: David Howells

Prev by Date: Re: Possible locking bug in the block layer [was syzbot: Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in iov_iter_revert (2)]
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] zram: refuse to use zero sized block device as backing device
Previous by thread: Re: Possible locking bug in the block layer [was syzbot: Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in iov_iter_revert (2)]
Next by thread: Re: Possible locking bug in the block layer [was syzbot: Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in iov_iter_revert (2)]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]