Re: [PATCH] block: rnull: Initialize the module in place

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Benoît du Garreau <benoit@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: rnull: Initialize the module in place
From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 12:23:30 +0100
Cc: "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <rust-for-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20241204-rnull_in_place-v1-1-efe3eafac9fb@dugarreau.fr> ("Benoît du Garreau"'s message of "Wed, 04 Dec 2024 09:38:39 +0100")
References: <KDOrOz0f1qbGhNBKxiESVrGZaUhIbkfe1DgOqgX3pd7N7hiaJpbrvaLUklCHjUrGgHOVsYl3M-crnKTUa_WMjA==@protonmail.internalid> <20241204-rnull_in_place-v1-1-efe3eafac9fb@dugarreau.fr>

Benoît du Garreau <benoit@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Using `InPlaceModule` avoids an allocation and an indirection.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benoît du Garreau <benoit@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good to me. Thanks!


Acked-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxx>


Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg

References:
- [PATCH] block: rnull: Initialize the module in place
  - From: Benoît du Garreau

Prev by Date: s390: block/blk-iocost.c:1101:11: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_557' declared with 'error' attribute: clamp() low limit 1 greater than high limit active
Next by Date: Lockdep splat on UMS disconnect (6.13-rc1)
Previous by thread: [PATCH] block: rnull: Initialize the module in place
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] block: rnull: Initialize the module in place
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux