Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Large folios in block buffered IO path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28-Nov-24 10:01 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:

WIlly mentioned the folio wait queue hash table could be grown, you
can find it in mm/filemap.c:
   1062 #define PAGE_WAIT_TABLE_BITS 8
   1063 #define PAGE_WAIT_TABLE_SIZE (1 << PAGE_WAIT_TABLE_BITS)
   1064 static wait_queue_head_t folio_wait_table[PAGE_WAIT_TABLE_SIZE]
__cacheline_aligned;
   1065
   1066 static wait_queue_head_t *folio_waitqueue(struct folio *folio)
   1067 {
   1068 │       return &folio_wait_table[hash_ptr(folio, PAGE_WAIT_TABLE_BITS)];
   1069 }

Can you collect off cpu time? offcputime-bpfcc -K > /tmp/out

Flamegraph for "perf record --off-cpu -F 99 -a -g --all-kernel --kernel-callchains -- sleep 120" is attached.

Off-cpu samples were collected for 120s at around 45th minute run of the FIO benchmark that actually runs for 1hr. This run was with kernel that had your inode_lock fix but no changes to PAGE_WAIT_TABLE_BITS.

Hopefully this captures the representative sample of the scalability issue with folio lock.

Regards,
Bharata.

Attachment: perf-inode-fix.svg
Description: image/svg


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux