Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/2] mTHP-friendly compression in zsmalloc and zram based on multi-pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On (24/11/19 09:27), Barry Song wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 10:56 PM Sergey Senozhatsky
> <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On (24/11/12 09:31), Barry Song wrote:
> > [..]
> Yes, some filesystems also support mTHP. A simple grep
> command can list them all:
> 
> fs % git grep mapping_set_large_folios
> afs/inode.c:            mapping_set_large_folios(inode->i_mapping);
> afs/inode.c:            mapping_set_large_folios(inode->i_mapping);
> bcachefs/fs.c:  mapping_set_large_folios(inode->v.i_mapping);
> erofs/inode.c:  mapping_set_large_folios(inode->i_mapping);
> nfs/inode.c:                    mapping_set_large_folios(inode->i_mapping);
> smb/client/inode.c:             mapping_set_large_folios(inode->i_mapping);
> zonefs/super.c: mapping_set_large_folios(inode->i_mapping);

Yeah, those are mostly not on-disk file systems, or not filesystems
that people use en-mass for r/w I/O workloads (e.g. vfat, ext4, etc.)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux