Re: [PATCH v2 19/21] livepatch: Convert timeouts to secs_to_jiffies()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Nov 19, 2024, at 02:18, Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 11/18/2024 3:06 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
>> On Sat 2024-11-16 11:10:52, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le 15/11/2024 à 22:26, Easwar Hariharan a écrit :
>>>> [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de eahariha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Découvrez pourquoi ceci est important à https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>>> 
>>>> Changes made with the following Coccinelle rules:
>>>> 
>>>> @@ constant C; @@
>>>> 
>>>> - msecs_to_jiffies(C * 1000)
>>>> + secs_to_jiffies(C)
>>>> 
>>>> @@ constant C; @@
>>>> 
>>>> - msecs_to_jiffies(C * MSEC_PER_SEC)
>>>> + secs_to_jiffies(C)
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c |  2 +-
>>>>  samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-fix1.c       |  2 +-
>>>>  samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-mod.c        | 10 +++++-----
>>>>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c b/samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c
>>>> index 378e2d40271a9717d09eff51d3d3612c679736fc..d0fd801a7c21b7d7939c29d83f9d993badcc9aba 100644
>>>> --- a/samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c
>>>> +++ b/samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c
>>>> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static int livepatch_callbacks_mod_init(void)
>>>>  {
>>>>         pr_info("%s\n", __func__);
>>>>         schedule_delayed_work(&work,
>>>> -               msecs_to_jiffies(1000 * 0));
>>>> +               secs_to_jiffies(0));
>>> 
>>> Using secs_to_jiffies() is pointless, 0 is universal, should become
>>> schedule_delayed_work(&work, 0);
>> 
>> Yes, schedule_delayed_work(&work, 0) looks like the right solution.
>> 
>> Or even better, it seems that the delayed work might get replaced by
>> a normal workqueue work.
>> 
>> Anyway, I am working on a patchset which would remove this sample
>> module. There is no need to put much effort into the clean up
>> of this particular module. Do whatever is easiest for you.
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> Petr
> 
> If we're removing the module, I'll drop it from the series. Just to
> clarify, do you mean to remove all of samples/livepatch/* or some
> particular file(s)?
> 
> Thanks,
> Easwar
> 

Hi Easwar!

I think Petr is going to remove just this module away. Anyway, I don't think
removing all of them is a good idea.

Thanks.
Wardenjohn. 






[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux