On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 03:46:26AM GMT, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > On 11/4/24 23:02, Daniel Wagner wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 11:29:07AM GMT, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > >> +# Test nvmet-wq cpumask sysfs attribute with NVMe-oF and fio workload > > What do you want to test here? What's the objective? I don't see any > > block layer related parts or do I miss something? > > For NVMeOF target we have exported nvmet-wq to userspace with > recent patch. This behavior is new and I don't think there is any test > exists that runs the fio workload while changing the CPUMASK randomly > to ensure the stability for nvmet-wq when application is using the block > layer. Hence we need the test for latest patch we have added to the > 6.13. Though this is not a performance measurement just a functional testing if the scheduler works. I don't think we should add such tests because it will add to the overall runtime for little benefit. I am pretty sure there already tests (e.g. kunit) which do more elaborate scheduler tests.
