"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi everyone, > > Nobody else has stepped up to do this, so I've created a work branch for > the fs side of untorn writes: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djwong/xfs-linux.git/log/?h=fs-atomic_2024-11-04 > > Can you all check this to make sure that I merged it correctly? Sorry, I couldn't reply earlier(I am currently on travel). Yes, the ext4 merge looks correct to me. You have taken the latest v4 of the ext4 atomic write series [1]. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/cover.1730437365.git.ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx/ > And maybe go test this on your storage hardware? :) Due to limited connectivity during my travel, I don't have the access to the hardware. But as I mentioned the merge looks correct to me and I had tested those patches earlier on Power and x86. But I will in general re-test the mentioned fs branch for both XFS and ext4 once I reach back but I don't think we need to wait for that as the merge looks good to me. Also, I noticed that we might have missed to add a Tested-by from Ojaswin for XFS series here [2]. Although Ojaswin mentioned that he might also re-test the mentioned FS atomic write branch for both XFS and EXT4. [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/Zxnp8bma2KrMDg5m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ -ritesh > If all goes well then I think the next step is to ask brauner very > nicely if he'd consider adding this to the vfs trees for 6.13. If not > then I guess we can submit it ourselves, though we probably ought to ask > rothwell to add the branch to for-next asap. > > PS: We're now past -rc6 so please reply quickly so that this doesn't > slip yet another cycle. > > Catherine: John's on vacation all week, could you please send me the > latest versions of the xfs_io pwrite-atomic patch and the fstest for it? > > --D
