On 20/10/2024 10:44, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
+ if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
+ /*
+ * Currently only atomic writing of a single FS block is
+ * supported. It would be possible to atomic write smaller than
+ * a FS block, but there is no requirement to support this.
+ * Note that iomap also does not support this yet.
+ */
+ if (ocount != ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize)
+ return -EINVAL;
Shouldn't we "return -ENOTSUPP" ?
Given we are later going to add support for ocount > sb_blocksize.
So far we have been reporting -EINVAL for an invalid atomic write size
(according to atomic write unit min and max reported for that inode).
-ENOTSUPP is used for times when we just don't support atomic writes,
like non-DIO.
Thanks,
John