Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] FDP and per-io hints

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/17/24 8:44 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 05:23:37PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
If you want to do useful stream separation you need to write data
sequentially into the stream.  Now with streams or FDP that does not
actually imply sequentially in LBA space, but if you want the file
system to not actually deal with fragmentation from hell, and be
easily track what is grouped together you really want it sequentially
in the LBA space as well.  In other words, any kind of write placement
needs to be intimately tied to the file system block allocator.

I'm replying just to make sure I understand what you're saying:

If we send per IO hints on a file, we could have interleaved hot and
cold pages at various offsets of that file, so the filesystem needs an
efficient way to allocate extents and track these so that it doesn't
interleave these in LBA space. I think that makes sense.

We can add a fop_flags and block/fops.c can be the first one to turn it
on since that LBA access is entirely user driven.

Does anyone care about buffered I/O to block devices? When using
buffered I/O, the write_hint information from the inode is used and the per I/O write_hint information is ignored.

Thanks,

Bart.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux