Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] FDP and per-io hints

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/1/24 3:20 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Any reason you completely ignored my feedback on the last version
> and did not even answer?

Probably because he got a little tired of dealing with the bullshit
related to this topic.

> That's not a very productive way to work.

Have to say, that neither have your responses been. Can't really fault
people for just giving up at some point, when no productive end seems to
be in sight.

As far as I'm concerned, this looks fine to me. There are customers
wanting to use us, and folks making drives that support it. It's not
right to continually gatekeep this feature just because you don't like
it.

I need to review the io_uring bits, but that should be the least of it.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux