Re: [PATCH RFC 1/6] block: Rework bio_split() return value
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/6] block: Rework bio_split() return value
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date
: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:07:53 +0200
Cc
: axboe@xxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
20240919092302.3094725-2-john.g.garry@oracle.com
>
References
: <
20240919092302.3094725-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com
> <
20240919092302.3094725-2-john.g.garry@oracle.com
>
User-agent
: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
This looks reasonable to me modulo the WARN_ON_ONCE comment from Johannes.
References
:
[PATCH RFC 0/6] bio_split() error handling rework
From:
John Garry
[PATCH RFC 1/6] block: Rework bio_split() return value
From:
John Garry
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH] block: Remove unused blk_limits_io_{min,opt}
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH RFC 3/6] block: Handle bio_split() errors in bio_submit_split()
Previous by thread:
Re: [PATCH RFC 1/6] block: Rework bio_split() return value
Next by thread:
[PATCH RFC 2/6] block: Error an attempt to split an atomic write in bio_split()
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[IDE]
[Linux Wireless]
[Linux Kernel]
[ATH6KL]
[Linux Bluetooth]
[Linux Netdev]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Device Mapper]