Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] fcntl: add F_{SET/GET}_RW_HINT_EX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/13/2024 2:06 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 9/10/24 8:01 AM, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/rw_hint.h b/include/linux/rw_hint.h
>> index b9942f5f13d3..ff708a75e2f6 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/rw_hint.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/rw_hint.h
>> @@ -21,4 +21,17 @@ enum rw_lifetime_hint {
>>   static_assert(sizeof(enum rw_lifetime_hint) == 1);
>>   #endif
>> +#define WRITE_HINT_TYPE_BIT    BIT(7)
>> +#define WRITE_HINT_VAL_MASK    (WRITE_HINT_TYPE_BIT - 1)
>> +#define WRITE_HINT_TYPE(h)    (((h) & WRITE_HINT_TYPE_BIT) ? \
>> +                TYPE_RW_PLACEMENT_HINT : TYPE_RW_LIFETIME_HINT)
>> +#define WRITE_HINT_VAL(h)    ((h) & WRITE_HINT_VAL_MASK)
>> +
>> +#define WRITE_PLACEMENT_HINT(h)    (((h) & WRITE_HINT_TYPE_BIT) ? \
>> +                 WRITE_HINT_VAL(h) : 0)
>> +#define WRITE_LIFETIME_HINT(h)    (((h) & WRITE_HINT_TYPE_BIT) ? \
>> +                 0 : WRITE_HINT_VAL(h))
>> +
>> +#define PLACEMENT_HINT_TYPE    WRITE_HINT_TYPE_BIT
>> +#define MAX_PLACEMENT_HINT_VAL    (WRITE_HINT_VAL_MASK - 1)
>>   #endif /* _LINUX_RW_HINT_H */
> 
> The above macros implement a union of two 7-bit types in an 8-bit field.
> Wouldn't we be better of by using two separate 8-bit values such that we
> don't need the above macros?

I had considered that, but it requires two bytes of space. In inode, 
bio, and request.
For example this change in inode:

@@ -674,7 +674,13 @@ struct inode {
         spinlock_t              i_lock; /* i_blocks, i_bytes, maybe 
i_size */
         unsigned short          i_bytes;
         u8                      i_blkbits;
-       u8                      i_write_hint;
+       union {
+               struct {
+                       enum rw_liftime_hint lifetime_hint;
+                       u8 placement_hint;
+               };
+               u16 i_write_hint;
+       };

With this, generic propagation code will continue to use 
inode->i_write_hint. And specific places (that care) can use either 
lifetime_hint or placement_hint.

That kills the need of type-bit and above macros, but we don't have the 
two bytes of space currently.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux