Re: [PATCH] block: elevator: avoid to load iosched module from this disk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/9/24 10:24, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 07:50:32AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 9/7/24 3:04 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> On 9/7/24 16:58, Ming Lei wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 08:35:22AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 09:43:31AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>>>>>> When switching io scheduler via sysfs, 'request_module' may be called
>>>>>> if the specified scheduler doesn't exist.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This was has deadlock risk because the module may be stored on FS behind
>>>>>> our disk since request queue is frozen before switching its elevator.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fix it by returning -EDEADLK in case that the disk is claimed, which
>>>>>> can be thought as one signal that the disk is mounted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some distributions(Fedora) simulates the original kernel command line of
>>>>>> 'elevator=foo' via 'echo foo > /sys/block/$DISK/queue/scheduler', and boot
>>>>>> hang is triggered.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cc: Richard Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Cc: Jiri Jaburek <jjaburek@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd suggest also:
>>>>>
>>>>> Bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219166
>>>>> Reported-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Reported-by: Jiri Jaburek <jjaburek@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Tested-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> So I have tested this patch and it does fix the issue, at the possible
>>>>> cost that now setting the scheduler can fail:
>>>>>
>>>>>   + for f in /sys/block/{h,s,ub,v}d*/queue/scheduler
>>>>>   + echo noop
>>>>>   /init: line 109: echo: write error: Resource deadlock avoided
>>>>>
>>>>> (I know I'm setting it to an impossible value here, but this could
>>>>> also happen when setting it to a valid one.)
>>>>
>>>> Actually in most of dist, io-schedulers are built-in, so request_module
>>>> is just a nop, but meta IO must be started.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Since almost no one checks the result of 'echo foo > /sys/...'  that
>>>>> would probably mean that sometimes a desired setting is silently not
>>>>> set.
>>>>
>>>> As I mentioned, io-schedulers are built-in for most of dist, so
>>>> request_module isn't called in case of one valid io-sched.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Also I bisected this bug yesterday and found it was caused by (or,
>>>>> more likely, exposed by):
>>>>>
>>>>>   commit af2814149883e2c1851866ea2afcd8eadc040f79
>>>>>   Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
>>>>>   Date:   Mon Jun 17 08:04:38 2024 +0200
>>>>>
>>>>>     block: freeze the queue in queue_attr_store
>>>>>     
>>>>>     queue_attr_store updates attributes used to control generating I/O, and
>>>>>     can cause malformed bios if changed with I/O in flight.  Freeze the queue
>>>>>     in common code instead of adding it to almost every attribute.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reverting this commit on top of git head also fixes the problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why did this commit expose the problem?
>>>>
>>>> That is really the 1st bad commit which moves queue freezing before
>>>> calling request_module(), originally we won't freeze queue until
>>>> we have to do it.
>>>>
>>>> Another candidate fix is to revert it, or at least not do it
>>>> for storing elevator attribute.
>>>
>>> I do not think that reverting is acceptable. Rather, a proper fix would simply
>>> be to do the request_module() before freezing the queue.
>>> Something like below should work (totally untested and that may be overkill).
>>
>> I like this approach, but let's please call it something descriptive
>> like "load_module" or something like that.
> 
> But 'load_module' is too specific as interface, and we just only have
> one case which need to load module exactly.

If another attr needs to do some prep work before freezing the queue and calling
attr->store(), we can rename the load_module attribute method to something like
"prepare_store" to be more generic.

> 
> I guess there may be same risk in queue_wb_lat_store() which calls into
> GFP_KERNEL allocation which implies direct reclaim & IO.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ming
> 

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux