Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] zram: Replace bit spinlocks with a spinlock_t.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 06 Sep 2024 16:14:42 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> this is follow up to the previous posting, making the lock
> unconditionally. The original problem with bit spinlock is that it
> disabled preemption and the following operations (within the atomic
> section) perform operations that may sleep on PREEMPT_RT. Mike expressed
> that he would like to keep using zram on PREEMPT_RT.
> 
> v3…v4: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20240705125058.1564001-1-bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>   - Inline lock init into zram_meta_alloc().
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/3] zram: Replace bit spinlocks with a spinlock_t.
      commit: 9518e5bfaae19447d657983d0628062ab6712610
[2/3] zram: Remove ZRAM_LOCK
      commit: 6086aeb49e3d9e25165769b2a0a13ff67f98a1a2
[3/3] zram: Shrink zram_table_entry::flags.
      commit: 68d20eb60efbdc80662efedeb088353e9c4aa17f

Best regards,
-- 
Jens Axboe







[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux