On 9/6/24 8:14 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Hi, > > this is follow up to the previous posting, making the lock > unconditionally. The original problem with bit spinlock is that it > disabled preemption and the following operations (within the atomic > section) perform operations that may sleep on PREEMPT_RT. Mike expressed > that he would like to keep using zram on PREEMPT_RT. Looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> -- Jens Axboe
