On Thu, 2024-08-29 at 07:04 -0400, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 8/29/24 3:18 AM, Tero Kristo wrote: > > Any thoughts about the patches and the approach taken? > > The optimal value for the PM QoS latency depends on the request size > and on the storage device characteristics. I think it would be better > if the latency value would be chosen automatically rather than > introducing yet another set of tunable sysfs parameters. > > Thanks, > > Bart. > Hi all, Based on the feedback received, I've updated my patch to work on the NVMe driver level instead of block layer. I'll send that to the corresponding list as a separate RFC, but for now these two patches can be ignored. -Tero
