Hi,
在 2024/09/04 10:28, Bart Van Assche 写道:
On 9/3/24 6:32 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
We do have customers are using bfq in downstream kernels, and we are
still running lots of test for bfq.
It may take less time to add any missing functionality to another I/O
scheduler rather than to keep maintaining BFQ.
If Android device vendors would stop using BFQ, my job would become
easier.
I'm confused now, I think keep maintaining BFQ won't stop you from
adding new functionality to another scheduler, right? Is this something
that all scheduler have to support?
Thanks,
Kuai
Thanks,
Bart.
.
