[PATCH] block: fix comment to use set_current_state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Alvaro Parker <alparkerdf@xxxxxxxxx>

The explanatory comment used `set_task_state` instead of
`set_current_state` which is the function actually used in the code.

Signed-off-by: Alvaro Parker <alparkerdf@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 block/blk-rq-qos.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-rq-qos.c b/block/blk-rq-qos.c
index dd7310c94713..2cfb297d9a62 100644
--- a/block/blk-rq-qos.c
+++ b/block/blk-rq-qos.c
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ void rq_qos_wait(struct rq_wait *rqw, void *private_data,
 	has_sleeper = !prepare_to_wait_exclusive(&rqw->wait, &data.wq,
 						 TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 	do {
-		/* The memory barrier in set_task_state saves us here. */
+		/* The memory barrier in set_current_state saves us here. */
 		if (data.got_token)
 			break;
 		if (!has_sleeper && acquire_inflight_cb(rqw, private_data)) {
-- 
2.46.0





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux