From: Alvaro Parker <alparkerdf@xxxxxxxxx> The explanatory comment used `set_task_state` instead of `set_current_state` which is the function actually used in the code. Signed-off-by: Alvaro Parker <alparkerdf@xxxxxxxxx> --- block/blk-rq-qos.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/blk-rq-qos.c b/block/blk-rq-qos.c index dd7310c94713..2cfb297d9a62 100644 --- a/block/blk-rq-qos.c +++ b/block/blk-rq-qos.c @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ void rq_qos_wait(struct rq_wait *rqw, void *private_data, has_sleeper = !prepare_to_wait_exclusive(&rqw->wait, &data.wq, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); do { - /* The memory barrier in set_task_state saves us here. */ + /* The memory barrier in set_current_state saves us here. */ if (data.got_token) break; if (!has_sleeper && acquire_inflight_cb(rqw, private_data)) { -- 2.46.0