> I agree, it's fine as-is. We should queue it up for 4.12. Great. I will get something based on Omar’s latest comments asap. > > However right now I am stuck as I am seeing the kernel oops I reported > > before in testing of my latest patchset [1]. I will try and find some >> time to bisect that but it looks like it was introduced when the > > support for mq schedulers was added (on or around bd166ef18). > Just replied to that one, let me know if the suggestion works. That suggestion worked. Do you want me to send a patch for it? Stephen
