On 8/28/24 8:26 AM, Christian Loehle wrote:
On 8/28/24 13:13, Bart Van Assche wrote:
I think that the following is missing from the above description:
- Mentioning that this is for an unusual interrupt routing technology
(SoC sends the interrupt to another CPU core than what has been
specified in the smp_affinity mask).
FWIW on !mcq that doesn't have to be the case.
Hmm ... is there any x86 architecture that ignores the smp_affinity
mask? I have not yet encountered an x86 system that does not respect
the smp_affinity mask.
Thanks,
Bart.
