Re: regression on generic/351 in 6.11-rc5?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: regression on generic/351 in 6.11-rc5?
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 21:50:55 -0700
Cc: linux-block <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, fstests <fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20240827020714.GK6047@frogsfrogsfrogs>
References: <20240827020714.GK6047@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 07:07:14PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed the following regression in generic/351 between
> 6.11-rc4 and -rc5?

Yes, I'm seeing this with a fresh -rc5 build.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: regression on generic/351 in 6.11-rc5?
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

References:
- regression on generic/351 in 6.11-rc5?
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: rework bio splitting
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] fs, block: refactor enum rw_hint
Previous by thread: regression on generic/351 in 6.11-rc5?
Next by thread: Re: regression on generic/351 in 6.11-rc5?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux