On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 08:48:03PM +0800, YangYang wrote:
> On 2024/7/11 3:54, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 7/9/24 11:56 PM, Yang Yang wrote:
> > > + /**
> > > + * @swap_lock: Held while swapping word <-> cleared
> > > + */
> > > + spinlock_t swap_lock;
> >
> > Why is only swapping 'word' with 'cleared' protected by the spinlock?
> > If all 'cleared' changes would be protected by this spinlock then
> > that would allow to eliminate the expensive xchg() call from
> > sbitmap_deferred_clear().
>
> The spinlock was initially introduced in ea86ea2cdced ("sbitmap:
> ammortize cost of clearing bits").
> I think if all 'cleared' changes are protected by the spinlock, the
> overhead of clearing tags would definitely increase.
There are only two WRITE on 'cleared':
- xchg(&map->cleared, 0) in sbitmap_deferred_clear()
- set_bit() in sbitmap_deferred_clear_bit()
xchg() supposes to provide such protection already.
Thanks,
Ming
