Re: [PATCH 5/5] loop: Don't bother validating blocksize
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: [PATCH 5/5] loop: Don't bother validating blocksize
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date
: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 14:18:30 +0200
Cc
: axboe@xxxxxxxxx, mst@xxxxxxxxxx, jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx, xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, eperezma@xxxxxxxxxx, pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx, stefanha@xxxxxxxxxx, hare@xxxxxxx, kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
20240705115127.3417539-6-john.g.garry@oracle.com
>
References
: <
20240705115127.3417539-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com
> <
20240705115127.3417539-6-john.g.garry@oracle.com
>
User-agent
: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
References
:
[PATCH 0/5] Validate logical block size in blk_validate_limits()
From:
John Garry
[PATCH 5/5] loop: Don't bother validating blocksize
From:
John Garry
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH 4/5] virtio_blk: Don't bother validating blocksize
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] zram: Replace bit spinlocks with a spinlock_t.
Previous by thread:
[PATCH 5/5] loop: Don't bother validating blocksize
Next by thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Validate logical block size in blk_validate_limits()
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[IDE]
[Linux Wireless]
[Linux Kernel]
[ATH6KL]
[Linux Bluetooth]
[Linux Netdev]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Device Mapper]