Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] zram: Replace bit spinlocks with a spinlock_t.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024-07-04 13:38:04 [+0200], Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > index 3acd7006ad2cc..036845cd4f25e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > @@ -57,19 +57,34 @@ static void zram_free_page(struct zram *zram, size_t index);
> >  static int zram_read_page(struct zram *zram, struct page *page, u32 index,
> >  			  struct bio *parent);
> >  
> > +static void zram_meta_init_table_locks(struct zram *zram, size_t num_pages)
> > +{
> > +	size_t index;
> > +
> > +	for (index = 0; index < num_pages; index++)
> 
> Maybe declare @index right here?

But why? Declarations at the top followed by code. 

> 
> > +		spin_lock_init(&zram->table[index].lock);
> > +}
> 
> [...]
> 
> Thanks,
> Olek

Sebastian




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux