Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] block: Added folio-lized version of bio_add_hw_page()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 04:15:50PM +0530, Kundan Kumar wrote:
> Added new bio_add_hw_folio() function. This is a prep patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kundan Kumar <kundan.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  block/bio.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  block/blk.h |  4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index e9e809a63c59..6c2db8317ae5 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -979,6 +979,31 @@ bool bvec_try_merge_hw_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio_vec *bv,
>  int bio_add_hw_page(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio,
>  		struct page *page, unsigned int len, unsigned int offset,
>  		unsigned int max_sectors, bool *same_page)
> +{
> +	struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
> +	size_t folio_offset = (folio_page_idx(folio, page) << PAGE_SHIFT) +
> +			       offset;

Probably purely subjective, but I find this more readable:

	size_t folio_offset =
		(folio_page_idx(folio, page) << PAGE_SHIFT) + offset;

> +	return bio_add_hw_folio(q, bio, folio, len, folio_offset, max_sectors,
> +				same_page);

... or just open code it here:

	return bio_add_hw_folio(q, bio, folio, len,
			(folio_page_idx(folio, page) << PAGE_SHIFT) + offset,
			max_sectors, same_page);

> +		if (bvec_try_merge_hw_page(q, bv, folio_page(folio, 0), len,
> +					   offset, same_page)) {

Eventually bvec_try_merge_hw_page should be folio-ized as well.  But
we can do this separately if you don't want to take it on.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux