Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Read/Write with meta/integrity
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Read/Write with meta/integrity
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date
: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:05:42 +0200
Cc
: asml.silence@xxxxxxxxx, mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
20240626100700.3629-1-anuj20.g@samsung.com
>
References
: <CGME20240626101415epcas5p3b06a963aa0b0196d6599fb86c90bc38c@epcas5p3.samsung.com> <
20240626100700.3629-1-anuj20.g@samsung.com
>
User-agent
: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
What tree does this apply to? There's quite a few rejects vs for-6.11/block.
Follow-Ups
:
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Read/Write with meta/integrity
From:
Kanchan Joshi
References
:
[PATCH v2 00/10] Read/Write with meta/integrity
From:
Anuj Gupta
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH] block: clean up the check in blkdev_iomap_begin()
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] block: copy bip_max_vcnt vecs instead of bip_vcnt during clone
Previous by thread:
Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] nvme: add handling for user integrity buffer
Next by thread:
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Read/Write with meta/integrity
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[IDE]
[Linux Wireless]
[Linux Kernel]
[ATH6KL]
[Linux Bluetooth]
[Linux Netdev]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Device Mapper]