Re: blktests dm/002 always fails for me

To: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: blktests dm/002 always fails for me
From: "hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 06:08:46 -0700
Cc: "hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bryan Gurney <bgurney@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <lkgvrxzyxf5gpxzdb5yq5epbhhxdz72rfqnjbzg4qyi6npndsw@g6wkv5jh37wj>
References: <ZmqrzUyLcUORPdOe@infradead.org> <pysa5z7udtu2rotezahzhkxjif7kc4nutl3b2f74n3qi2sp7wr@nt5morq6exph> <ZmvezI1KcsyE3Unl@infradead.org> <42ecobcsduvlqh77iavjj2p3ewdh7u4opdz4xruauz4u5ddljz@yr7ye4fq72tr> <Znkxn7LymUjD3Wac@infradead.org> <i4skne2yegneuyuw7nqt2mziuywjwo2p54emgba3fjcg5rflhe@dvqy65je7boc> <ZnlcrgxYvqqy5uoK@infradead.org> <lkgvrxzyxf5gpxzdb5yq5epbhhxdz72rfqnjbzg4qyi6npndsw@g6wkv5jh37wj>

Yes, it is a 4k block size device.  With your patch the test passes
fine.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: blktests dm/002 always fails for me
  - From: Shinichiro Kawasaki

References:
- blktests dm/002 always fails for me
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: blktests dm/002 always fails for me
  - From: Shinichiro Kawasaki
- Re: blktests dm/002 always fails for me
  - From: hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: blktests dm/002 always fails for me
  - From: Shinichiro Kawasaki
- Re: blktests dm/002 always fails for me
  - From: hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: blktests dm/002 always fails for me
  - From: Shinichiro Kawasaki
- Re: blktests dm/002 always fails for me
  - From: hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: blktests dm/002 always fails for me
  - From: Shinichiro Kawasaki