On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 12:41 AM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 6/14/24 12:49 AM, Dongliang Cui wrote:
> > - TP_printk("%d,%d %s (%s) %llu + %u [%d]",
> > + TP_printk("%d,%d %s (%s) %llu + %u %s,%u,%u [%d]",
> > MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
> > __entry->rwbs, __get_str(cmd),
> > - (unsigned long long)__entry->sector,
> > - __entry->nr_sector, 0)
> > + (unsigned long long)__entry->sector, __entry->nr_sector,
> > + __print_symbolic(IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(__entry->ioprio),
> > + IOPRIO_CLASS_STRINGS),
> > + IOPRIO_PRIO_HINT(__entry->ioprio),
> > + IOPRIO_PRIO_LEVEL(__entry->ioprio), 0)
> > );
>
> Do we really want to include the constant "[0]" in the tracing output?
This is how it is printed in the source code.
