Re: [RFC blktests v2 2/3] nvme/030: only run against kernel soft target

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jun 12, 2024 / 13:04, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> This tests is exercising the target code and not so much the host side.

s/tests/test/

> The problem with nvme/030 is that it depends on interface to interact
> with the target which is not covered by the standard. Thus we can't
> run it against a real target. Just skip it when we run against a
> real target.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tests/nvme/030 | 1 +
>  tests/nvme/rc  | 8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/nvme/030 b/tests/nvme/030
> index b1ed8bc20908..672487734332 100755
> --- a/tests/nvme/030
> +++ b/tests/nvme/030
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ requires() {
>  	_nvme_requires
>  	_have_loop
>  	_require_nvme_trtype_is_fabrics
> +	_require_kernel_target

The function name sounds generic too much for me. How about
_require_kernel_nvme_target? (The current name reminds me SCSI target).

>  }
>  
>  set_conditions() {
> diff --git a/tests/nvme/rc b/tests/nvme/rc
> index aaa64453fe16..4a2d107bd532 100644
> --- a/tests/nvme/rc
> +++ b/tests/nvme/rc
> @@ -219,6 +219,14 @@ _require_kernel_nvme_fabrics_feature() {
>  	return 0
>  }
>  
> +_require_kernel_target() {
> +	if [[ -n "${nvme_target_control}" ]]; then
> +		SKIP_REASONS+=("Linux kernel soft target not available")
> +		return 1;
> +	fi
> +	return 0
> +}
> +
>  _test_dev_nvme_ctrl() {
>  	echo "/dev/char/$(cat "${TEST_DEV_SYSFS}/device/dev")"
>  }
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux