Re: [PATCH] null_blk: fix validation of block size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/06/2024 21:23, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Block size should be between 512


and 4096

Or PAGE_SIZE?

 and be a power of 2. The current
check does not validate this, so update the check.

Without this patch, null_blk would Oops due to a null pointer deref when
loaded with bs=1536 [1].

Link: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/all/87wmn8mocd.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxx/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!OWXI3DGxeIAWvKfM5oVSiA5fTWmiRvUctIdVrcBcKnO_HF-vgkarVfd27jkvQ1-JjNgX5IFIvBWcsUttvg$

Signed-off-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/block/null_blk/main.c | 6 ++++--
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c b/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
index eb023d267369..6a26888c52bb 100644
--- a/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
+++ b/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
@@ -1823,8 +1823,10 @@ static int null_validate_conf(struct nullb_device *dev)
  		dev->queue_mode = NULL_Q_MQ;
  	}
- dev->blocksize = round_down(dev->blocksize, 512);
-	dev->blocksize = clamp_t(unsigned int, dev->blocksize, 512, 4096);
+	if ((dev->blocksize < 512 || dev->blocksize > 4096) ||
+	    ((dev->blocksize & (dev->blocksize - 1)) != 0)) {
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}

Looks like blk_validate_block_size(), modulo PAGE_SIZE check

if (dev->use_per_node_hctx) {
  		if (dev->submit_queues != nr_online_nodes)

base-commit: 1613e604df0cd359cf2a7fbd9be7a0bcfacfabd0





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux