Re: [PATCH 4/7] swapon(2): open swap with O_EXCL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] swapon(2): open swap with O_EXCL
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:39:40 +0200
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20240427211128.GD1495312@ZenIV>
References: <20240427210920.GR2118490@ZenIV> <20240427211128.GD1495312@ZenIV>

On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:11:28PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> ... eliminating the need to reopen block devices so they could be
> exclusively held.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCHES][RFC] set_blocksize() rework
  - From: Al Viro
- [PATCH 4/7] swapon(2): open swap with O_EXCL
  - From: Al Viro

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/7] swapon(2)/swapoff(2): don't bother with block size
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/7] swsusp: don't bother with setting block size
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/7] swapon(2): open swap with O_EXCL
Next by thread: [PATCH 5/7] swsusp: don't bother with setting block size
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux