Re: [PATCH blktests 01/11] check: factor out _run_test()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/04/24 08:12PM, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
The function _run_test() is rather complex and has deep nests. Before
modifying it for repeated test case runs, simplify it. Factor out some
part of the function to the new functions _check_and_call_test() and
_check_and_call_test_device().

Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@xxxxxxx>
---
check | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/check b/check
index 55871b0..b1f5212 100755
--- a/check
+++ b/check
@@ -463,6 +463,56 @@ _unload_modules() {
	unset MODULES_TO_UNLOAD
}

+_check_and_call_test() {

ret should be declared ret as local ?

+	if declare -fF requires >/dev/null; then
+		requires
+	fi
+
+	RESULTS_DIR="$OUTPUT/nodev"
+	_call_test test
+	ret=$?
+	if (( RUN_ZONED_TESTS && CAN_BE_ZONED )); then
+		RESULTS_DIR="$OUTPUT/nodev_zoned"
+		RUN_FOR_ZONED=1
+		_call_test test
+		ret=$(( ret || $? ))
+	fi
+
+	return $ret
+}
+
+_check_and_call_test_device() {
+	local unset_skip_reason

Same here, ret should declared be local ?

Reviewed-by: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@xxxxxxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux