On 4/5/24 01:46, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Calling limit_depth with the hctx set make sense, but the way it's done
looks odd. Why not something like this?
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index b8dbfed8b28be1..88886fd93b1a9c 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -448,6 +448,10 @@ static struct request *__blk_mq_alloc_requests(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
if (data->cmd_flags & REQ_NOWAIT)
data->flags |= BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT;
+retry:
+ data->ctx = blk_mq_get_ctx(q);
+ data->hctx = blk_mq_map_queue(q, data->cmd_flags, data->ctx);
+
if (q->elevator) {
/*
* All requests use scheduler tags when an I/O scheduler is
@@ -469,13 +473,9 @@ static struct request *__blk_mq_alloc_requests(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
if (ops->limit_depth)
ops->limit_depth(data->cmd_flags, data);
}
- }
-
-retry:
- data->ctx = blk_mq_get_ctx(q);
- data->hctx = blk_mq_map_queue(q, data->cmd_flags, data->ctx);
- if (!(data->rq_flags & RQF_SCHED_TAGS))
+ } else {
blk_mq_tag_busy(data->hctx);
+ }
if (data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED)
data->rq_flags |= RQF_RESV;
Hi Christoph,
The above patch looks good to me and I'm fine with replacing patch 1/2
with the above patch. Do you want me to add your Signed-off-by to the
above patch?
Thanks,
Bart.
