Re: [v5.15 Regression] block: rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [v5.15 Regression] block: rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 20:05:12 +0200
Cc: hch@xxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sashal@xxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Francis Ginther <francis.ginther@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <924449dc-9b1f-4943-afe3-a68c03aedbb5@canonical.com>
References: <924449dc-9b1f-4943-afe3-a68c03aedbb5@canonical.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

Hi Joseph.

given that Canonical ignores our kernel licensing rules and tries to
get away with it I'm not going to offer any help to Canonical at all.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v5.15 Regression] block: rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART
  - From: Joseph Salisbury

References:
- [v5.15 Regression] block: rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART
  - From: Joseph Salisbury

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC 4/9] dm: add llseek(SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA) support
Next by Date: Re: [v5.15 Regression] block: rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART
Previous by thread: Re: [v5.15 Regression] block: rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART
Next by thread: Re: [v5.15 Regression] block: rename GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN to GENHD_FL_NO_PART
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux