Re: Oddities in brd queue limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/2/24 15:18, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 03:17:26PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
Hi Christoph,

brd ends up with the following queue limits:

optimal_io_size: 0
minimum_io_size: 4096
hw_sector_size: 512
physical_block_size: 4096

which I find particularly odd; how can the minimum I/O size be _larger_
than the hw_sector_size? Wouldn't that imply that we can only send I/O
in units of physical block size, rendering the hw_sector_size pretty much
pointless?

The minimum_io_size is always larger or equal to hw sector size.
It really is the minimal efficient I/O size.


So is it a hard limit (as in: we cannot send I/O smaller than that)
or a soft limit (as in: we should not send I/O smaller than that)?

Cheers,

Hannes





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux