Hi Bart, > On 11 Apr 2017, at 17.19, Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 16:31 +0200, Javier González wrote: >> Changes since v4: >> * Rebase on top of Matias' for-4.12/core >> * Fix type implicit conversions reported by sparse (reported by Bart Van >> Assche) >> * Make error and debug statistics long atomic variables. > > Hello Javier, > > Thanks for the quick respin. But have you already had a look at the > diagnostics reported by smatch? Smatch reports e.g. > > drivers/lightnvm/pblk-rb.c:783: pblk_rb_tear_down_check() error: we previously assumed 'rb->entries' could be null (see line 779) > > on the following code: > > if (rb->entries) > goto out; > > for (i = 0; i < rb->nr_entries; i++) { > entry = &rb->entries[i]; > > if (entry->data) > goto out; > } > > Is that "if (rb->entries)" check correct or should that perhaps been > "if (!rb->entries)"? Smatch is available at http://repo.or.cz/w/smatch.git. I have run smatch over the code (did not know the tool, so thanks!). This particular error has been fixed on v5. The only standing warning relates to a semaphore on pblk-map that is taken on the erase path. This is a false positive; it is intended that the semaphore lock is taken here and then released on the completion path. Sparse and coccicheck have been also been used on v5, but please point out to any other tools/concerns you may have. > Bart. Thanks, Javier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP