On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 12:37:23PM +0100, Christian Göttsche wrote: > Add the interfaces `capable_any()` and `ns_capable_any()` as an > alternative to multiple `capable()`/`ns_capable()` calls, like > `capable_any(CAP_SYS_NICE, CAP_SYS_ADMIN)` instead of > `capable(CAP_SYS_NICE) || capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)`. > > `capable_any()`/`ns_capable_any()` will in particular generate exactly > one audit message, either for the left most capability in effect or, if > the task has none, the first one. > > This is especially helpful with regard to SELinux, where each audit > message about a not allowed capability request will create a denial > message. Using this new wrapper with the least invasive capability as > left most argument (e.g. CAP_SYS_NICE before CAP_SYS_ADMIN) enables > policy writers to only grant the least invasive one for the particular > subject instead of both. > > CC: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v5: > - add check for identical passed capabilities > - rename internal helper according to flag rename to > ns_capable_noauditondeny() > v4: > Use CAP_OPT_NODENYAUDIT via added ns_capable_nodenyaudit() > v3: > - rename to capable_any() > - fix typo in function documentation > - add ns_capable_any() > v2: > avoid varargs and fix to two capabilities; capable_or3() can be added > later if needed > --- > include/linux/capability.h | 10 ++++++ > kernel/capability.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/capability.h b/include/linux/capability.h > index 0c356a517991..eeb958440656 100644 > --- a/include/linux/capability.h > +++ b/include/linux/capability.h > @@ -146,7 +146,9 @@ extern bool has_capability_noaudit(struct task_struct *t, int cap); > extern bool has_ns_capability_noaudit(struct task_struct *t, > struct user_namespace *ns, int cap); > extern bool capable(int cap); > +extern bool capable_any(int cap1, int cap2); > extern bool ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap); > +extern bool ns_capable_any(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap1, int cap2); > extern bool ns_capable_noaudit(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap); > extern bool ns_capable_setid(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap); > #else > @@ -172,10 +174,18 @@ static inline bool capable(int cap) > { > return true; > } > +static inline bool capable_any(int cap1, int cap2) > +{ > + return true; > +} > static inline bool ns_capable(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap) > { > return true; > } > +static inline bool ns_capable_any(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap1, int cap2) > +{ > + return true; > +} > static inline bool ns_capable_noaudit(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap) > { > return true; > diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c > index dac4df77e376..73358abfe2e1 100644 > --- a/kernel/capability.c > +++ b/kernel/capability.c > @@ -402,6 +402,23 @@ bool ns_capable_noaudit(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(ns_capable_noaudit); > > +/** > + * ns_capable_noauditondeny - Determine if the current task has a superior capability > + * (unaudited when unauthorized) in effect > + * @ns: The usernamespace we want the capability in > + * @cap: The capability to be tested for > + * > + * Return true if the current task has the given superior capability currently > + * available for use, false if not. > + * > + * This sets PF_SUPERPRIV on the task if the capability is available on the > + * assumption that it's about to be used. > + */ > +static bool ns_capable_noauditondeny(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap) > +{ > + return ns_capable_common(ns, cap, CAP_OPT_NOAUDIT_ONDENY); > +} > + > /** > * ns_capable_setid - Determine if the current task has a superior capability > * in effect, while signalling that this check is being done from within a > @@ -421,6 +438,62 @@ bool ns_capable_setid(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(ns_capable_setid); > > +/** > + * ns_capable_any - Determine if the current task has one of two superior capabilities in effect > + * @ns: The usernamespace we want the capability in > + * @cap1: The capabilities to be tested for first > + * @cap2: The capabilities to be tested for secondly > + * > + * Return true if the current task has at least one of the two given superior > + * capabilities currently available for use, false if not. > + * > + * In contrast to or'ing capable() this call will create exactly one audit > + * message, either for @cap1, if it is granted or both are not permitted, > + * or @cap2, if it is granted while the other one is not. > + * > + * The capabilities should be ordered from least to most invasive, i.e. CAP_SYS_ADMIN last. > + * > + * This sets PF_SUPERPRIV on the task if the capability is available on the > + * assumption that it's about to be used. > + */ > +bool ns_capable_any(struct user_namespace *ns, int cap1, int cap2) > +{ > + if (cap1 == cap2) > + return ns_capable(ns, cap1); > + > + if (ns_capable_noauditondeny(ns, cap1)) > + return true; > + > + if (ns_capable_noauditondeny(ns, cap2)) > + return true; > + > + return ns_capable(ns, cap1); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ns_capable_any); > + > +/** > + * capable_any - Determine if the current task has one of two superior capabilities in effect > + * @cap1: The capabilities to be tested for first > + * @cap2: The capabilities to be tested for secondly > + * > + * Return true if the current task has at least one of the two given superior > + * capabilities currently available for use, false if not. > + * > + * In contrast to or'ing capable() this call will create exactly one audit > + * message, either for @cap1, if it is granted or both are not permitted, > + * or @cap2, if it is granted while the other one is not. > + * > + * The capabilities should be ordered from least to most invasive, i.e. CAP_SYS_ADMIN last. > + * > + * This sets PF_SUPERPRIV on the task if the capability is available on the > + * assumption that it's about to be used. > + */ > +bool capable_any(int cap1, int cap2) > +{ > + return ns_capable_any(&init_user_ns, cap1, cap2); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(capable_any); > + > /** > * capable - Determine if the current task has a superior capability in effect > * @cap: The capability to be tested for > -- > 2.43.0 > >