Re: [PATCH 1/5] block: move discard checks into the ioctl handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 04:12:54PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > +	if (!nr_sects)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> > +	if ((sector | nr_sects) & bs_mask)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> > -
> >  	if (start + len > bdev_nr_bytes(bdev))
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> 
> Maybe you want to shift lower bytes out of consideration, but it is
> different, right? For example, if I call this ioctl with start=5 and
> len=555, it would return EINVAL, but your change would let it succeed
> the same as if start=0, len=512.

We did the same before, just down in __blkdev_issue_discard instead of
in the ioctl handler.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux