Re: RFC: untangle and fix __blkdev_issue_discard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 02:05:03PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 08:11:47AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > this tries to address the block for-next oops Chandan reported on XFS.
> > I can't actually reproduce it unfortunately, but this series should
> > sort it out by movign the fatal_signal_pending check out of all but
> > the ioctl path.
> 
> The last patch moves fatal_signal_pending check to blkdev_issue_discard
> path, which has a more users than just the ioctl path. 

That's true.  I guess I actually need to open code blkdev_issue_discard
in the ioctl path or pass a flag (which would be a bit annoying)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux