On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 02:05:03PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 08:11:47AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > this tries to address the block for-next oops Chandan reported on XFS. > > I can't actually reproduce it unfortunately, but this series should > > sort it out by movign the fatal_signal_pending check out of all but > > the ioctl path. > > The last patch moves fatal_signal_pending check to blkdev_issue_discard > path, which has a more users than just the ioctl path. That's true. I guess I actually need to open code blkdev_issue_discard in the ioctl path or pass a flag (which would be a bit annoying)
