On 06/03/2024 21:14, Dave Chinner wrote:
diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
index bcd3f8cf5ea4..733f83f839b6 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static loff_t iomap_dio_bio_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
{
const struct iomap *iomap = &iter->iomap;
struct inode *inode = iter->inode;
- unsigned int fs_block_size = i_blocksize(inode), pad;
+ unsigned int zeroing_size, pad;
loff_t length = iomap_length(iter);
loff_t pos = iter->pos;
blk_opf_t bio_opf;
@@ -288,6 +288,8 @@ static loff_t iomap_dio_bio_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
size_t copied = 0;
size_t orig_count;
+ zeroing_size = i_blocksize(inode) << iomap->extent_shift;
The iomap interfaces use units of bytes for offsets, sizes, ranges,
etc. Using shifts to define a granularity value seems like a
throwback to decades old XFS code and just a bit weird nowdays. Can
we just pass this as a byte count? i.e.:
zeroing_size = i_blocksize(inode);
if (iomap->extent_size)
zeroing_size = iomap->extent_size;
Fine
I was also thinking of something like i_extentsize() for vfs, which
would save requiring adding iomap->extent_size, but decided to limit vfs
changes.
Thanks,
John