Re: Re: [PATCH blktests v2 0/2] make nvme/048 checks more robust

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH blktests v2 0/2] make nvme/048 checks more robust
From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 08:20:54 +0100
Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@xxxxxxxxxx>, Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <6ijuychwshzssoorymvko2b2aycmu5x5oc6zi6j2yzubsegkac@qlg4hs7ii7kp>
References: <20240304134826.31965-1-dwagner@suse.de> <6ijuychwshzssoorymvko2b2aycmu5x5oc6zi6j2yzubsegkac@qlg4hs7ii7kp>

On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 01:29:18AM +0000, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> Of note is that I removed the left if block in nvmf_check_queue_count(), which I
> believe unnecessary.

This was also what I did. But somehow I managed to send out the wrong
version. Thanks for fixing it!

References:
- [PATCH blktests v2 0/2] make nvme/048 checks more robust
  - From: Daniel Wagner
- Re: [PATCH blktests v2 0/2] make nvme/048 checks more robust
  - From: Shinichiro Kawasaki

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] block: move capacity validation to blkpg_do_ioctl()
Next by Date: [PATCH] aoe: fix the potential use-after-free problem in aoecmd_cfg_pkts
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH blktests v2 0/2] make nvme/048 checks more robust
Next by thread: [PATCH blktests v1 0/2] extend nvme/045 to reconnect with invalid key
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux