> +#define BDEV_STATX_SUPPORTED_MASK (STATX_DIOALIGN | STATX_WRITE_ATOMIC) > + if (!(request_mask & BDEV_STATX_SUPPORTED_MASK)) > + return; BDEV_STATX_SUPPORTED_MASK is misleading here. bdevs support a lot more fields, these are just the ones needing special attention. I'd do away with the extra define and just open code it. > + /* If this is a block device inode, override the filesystem > + * attributes with the block device specific parameters > + * that need to be obtained from the bdev backing inode > + */ This is not the normal kernel multi-line comment format. > + if (S_ISBLK(d_backing_inode(path.dentry)->i_mode)) > + bdev_statx(path.dentry, stat, request_mask); I know I touched this last, but does anyone remember why we have various random fixups in vfs_statx and not in vfs_getattr_nosec, where they we have more of them and also the inode at hand?
