On 12/25/23 04:51, Yu Kuai wrote:
Are you still intrested in this patchset? I really want this switch in our product as well. If so, how do you think about following changes, a new field in blk_mq_tag_set will make synchronization much eaiser.
Do you perhaps see the new field as an alternative for the BLK_MQ_F_DISABLE_FAIR_TAG_SHARING flag? I'm not sure that would be an improvement. hctx_may_queue() is called from the hot path. Using the 'flags' field will make it easier for the compiler to optimize that function compared to using a new structure member. Thanks, Bart.
