Re: [PATCH] nvme: add nvme pci timeout testcase

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/10/2024 6:59 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/10/24 1:12 AM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Should this be TEST_DEV instead ?
>>>>
>>>> why ?
>>>>
>>> My understanding of blktests is, add device which we want to test in
>>> config files under TEST_DEV (except null-blk and nvme-fabrics loopback
>>> devices, which are usually populated inside the tests).
>>> In this case, if someone do not want to disturb nvme0n1 device,
>>> this test doesn't allow it.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Nitesh Shetty
>>>
>>
>> it is clearly stated in the documentation that blktests are destructive
>> to the entire system and including any devices you have, if your
>> system has sensitive data then _don't run these tests_ simple, when
>> you are running blktests you are bound to disturb system you can't
>> prevent that by using TEST_DEV.
> 
> It should very much be possible to run blktests on specific devices
> ONLY, the intent of a test suite is not to potentially mess up
> everything around you. It should ONLY operate on the devices given, not
> poke at random devices in the system.
> 
I'll make the TEST_DEV change ..

-ck






[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux