Re: [PATCH blktests v2 2/2] block/031: allow to run with built-in null_blk driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/9/24 18:19, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
On Jan 09, 2024 / 12:19, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 1/9/24 02:44, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
The parameter has been set as a module parameter then null_blk
driver must be loadable.

It seems like the word "If" is missing from the start of the above sentence?

With this sentence, I wanted to describe current implmenetation fact. Before
applying this patch, shared_tag_bitmap=1 was set as a module parameter, not
through a configfs file. So I don't think "If" is missing.

If I upload the sentence that I quoted to a free online grammar checker
(https://quillbot.com/grammar-check) then it tells me that there is a
grammatical issue with that sentence. That's why I asked whether a word is
perhaps missing. I'm not trying to be pedantic - I raised my question because
the above sentence is incomprehensible to me.

I think the inline comment above was not clear enough and caused the confusion.
How about to improve the comment as follows? I hope it explains why
_init_null_blk is called in the if-statement.

         # _configure_null_blk() sets null_blk parameters via configfs, while
	# _init_null_blk() sets null_blk parameters as module parameters.
         # Old kernel requires shared_tag_bitmap as a module parameter. In that
	# case, call _init_null_blk() for shared_tag_bitmap.

That sounds better to me.

Thanks,

Bart.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux