Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: make __get_task_ioprio() easier to read

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/8/24 10:59, Jens Axboe wrote:
We don't need to do any gymnastics if we don't have an io_context
assigned at all, so just return early with our default priority.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  include/linux/ioprio.h | 8 ++++----
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/ioprio.h b/include/linux/ioprio.h
index d6a9b5b7ed16..db1249cd9692 100644
--- a/include/linux/ioprio.h
+++ b/include/linux/ioprio.h
@@ -59,13 +59,13 @@ static inline int __get_task_ioprio(struct task_struct *p)
  	struct io_context *ioc = p->io_context;
  	int prio;
+ if (!ioc)
+		return IOPRIO_DEFAULT;
+
  	if (p != current)
  		lockdep_assert_held(&p->alloc_lock);
-	if (ioc)
-		prio = ioc->ioprio;
-	else
-		prio = IOPRIO_DEFAULT;
+ prio = ioc->ioprio;
  	if (IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(prio) == IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE)
  		prio = IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE(task_nice_ioclass(p),
  					 task_nice_ioprio(p));

Shouldn't it be mentioned in the subject that this patch is a performance
optimization? Anyway:

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux