On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 11:08:15 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> It's clearly been a while since someone looked at this, so I gave it a
> quick shot. There are few issues in here:
>
> - Random bundling of members that are mostly read-only and often written
> - Random holes that need not be there
>
> This moves the most frequently used bits into cacheline 1 and 2, with
> the 2nd one being more write intensive than the first one, which is
> basically read-only.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] block: improve struct request_queue layout
commit: 0c734c5ea76e333fbb8dd83b5bab46291b38096b
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
