Re: [PATCH] block: Use pr_info() instead of printk(KERN_INFO ...)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Use pr_info() instead of printk(KERN_INFO ...)
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:57:27 -0800
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20231213194702.90381-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
References: <20231213194702.90381-1-bvanassche@acm.org>

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 11:47:02AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Switch to the modern style of printing kernel messages. Use %u instead
> of %d to print unsigned integers.

Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@xxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH] block: Use pr_info() instead of printk(KERN_INFO ...)
  - From: Bart Van Assche

Prev by Date: [PATCH] block: Use pr_info() instead of printk(KERN_INFO ...)
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH V3] blk-mq: don't schedule block kworker on isolated CPUs
Previous by thread: [PATCH] block: Use pr_info() instead of printk(KERN_INFO ...)
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] block: Use pr_info() instead of printk(KERN_INFO ...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux