On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 11:03:06AM -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > As one of users of zoned devices, I disagree this is a broken model, So you think that chasing potential for reordering all over the I/O stack in perpetualality, including obscure error handling paths and disabling features intentended to throttle and delay I/O (like ioprio and cgroups) is not a broken model? > it is essential to place the data per file to get better bandwidth. And for > NAND-based storage, filesystem is the right place to deal with the more efficient > garbage collecion based on the known data locations. And that works perfectly fine match for zone append. > That's why all the flash > storage vendors adopted it in the JEDEC. Everyone sucking up to Google to place their product in Android, yes.. > Agreed that zone append is nice, but > IMO, it's not practical for production. You've delivered exactly zero arguments for that.
